If yous accept been creating smart devices, yous certain mightiness accept worked on Contiki OS. Almost all devices prior to the launch of Windows 10 IoT edition were either using Contiki OS or Linux for creating interactive smart devices that brand the Internet of Things. There are another lesser known OS too. So which is amend for Internet of Things? This comparing helps yous select the OS for your Internet of Things project.
What is Contiki OS
Contiki is an opened upwards origin operating organization for Internet of Things. You tin john rank that Contiki dominates the marketplace position when it comes to Internet of Things’ devices. With the introduction of Windows 10 for IoT, futurity may alter every bit the Windows 10 is instantly a feasible OS for IoT. Check out this comparing – Contiki vs Windows 10 – to know which 1 of them is amend for your IoT project.
Size of Contiki compared to Windows 10 for IoT
When it comes to smart devices or Internet of Things, footprint of the OS is the outset affair to consider. Since most of yous mightiness hold out using a single board computer, yous volition accept to proceed the OS footprint modest hence that yous tin john adapt information etc. on the same board. You accept to select an OS that occupies lower infinite on the board hence that at that topographic point is infinite available for other apps in addition to information files.
A stripped downwardly version (for e.g., afterwards removing debugging tools) Contiki occupies solely 32KB field Windows 10 for IoT is a lot bigger. Basically, Windows 10 for IoT has been designed alongside Raspberry Pi 2 inward mind. The average infinite requirements for Windows 10 IoT edition is to a greater extent than or less 200MB. You tin john come across that the departure is huge.
Don’t boundary your gun on this 1 point. Check out other features inward this comparing of Contiki alongside Windows 10 IoT edition. While OS footprint is 1 objective, the other major objectives of programmers are to supply skillful interface in addition to safety for halt users.
Contiki OS vs Windows 10 for IoT
RAM requirements
Contiki is the winner in 1 lawsuit to a greater extent than when it comes to RAM requirements. It tin john produce good alongside minimum RAM of 10KB. Windows 10 for IoT requires 256MB of RAM when yous don’t need display. If yous are using display every bit well, the RAM requirements for Windows 10 for IoT growth to 512MB.
An of import request to hold out noted hither is that field Contiki pith is 10KB RAM, you’ll need to a greater extent than if yous utilization the full-fledged operating system. In that case, yous tin john facial expression Contiki’s RAM requirement to hold out over 50KB but soundless pretty less compared to Windows 10 IoT edition that requires >= 256MB fifty-fifty for a stripped down, without display option.
User Interface
Coming to the user interface, Windows 10 IoT scores much to a greater extent than compared to Contiki. Both Windows 10 (IoT) in addition to Contiki are able to supply graphical user interface (GUI) to the halt users. Contiki, however, is a combat coarse compared to the smoothen interface provided past times Windows 10 IoT Edition. If yous accept seen the MS Word for DOS edition, you’ll know what a coarse GUI is. To teach an idea, press Windows cardinal in addition to R at the same fourth dimension to select upwards Run dialog. In the Run dialog, type EDIT to opened upwards DOS based give-and-take processor integrating graphical user interface. Then opened upwards Notepad from Start Menu -> All Apps. Check out the interface of both to teach an thought of how dissimilar is the experience. Obviously, the smoothness of pixels is 1 of the strongest points of Windows 10 for Internet of Things edition. However, it uses much to a greater extent than RAM to supply this experience.
If yous need to supply a user interface that involves considerable steps on move of halt users, Windows 10 for IoT is better. But if it is a basic user interface – alongside non many interactions on move of user, yous should become for Contiki every bit it is non feasible to engage hence much RAM (256 MB RAM) for exactly 1 or ii prompts to the halt user. It depends upon what variety of device yous are developing.
Security
Experts accept many security concerns well-nigh Internet of Things. Windows 10 for IoT scores in 1 lawsuit to a greater extent than when it comes to built-in security. It is non that Contiki cannot supply security. In Contiki also, yous tin john implement skillful safety if yous know how to become well-nigh processing it. That is, yous volition accept to delve deeper into programming to house several checkpoints or at to the lowest degree utilization Contiki’s pre-built patches that elevate security.
With Contiki, programmers accept to utilization customized safety scripts for enhancing safety for processes such every bit firewalls, information transmission over network/Internet, in addition to logins. If yous produce non wishing to pass much fourth dimension on basic security, Windows 10 IoT is better. If yous are create to code safety scripts in addition to user interface is non an issue, Contiki is better.
You tin john also create safety patches for IoT in addition to reuse them when developing on Contiki. An illustration of such safety patches for IoT is implementation of AES encryption for information transmission in addition to encrypted local or cloud storage. You exactly developed an independent code that tin john hold out called to dissimilar programs. While calling such code, yous may conk parameters that the code volition procedure for desired results.
Remember that the to a greater extent than safety yous implement, the to a greater extent than volition hold out OS’ disk requirement in addition to RAM usage.
Conclusion
At the basic level, Windows 10 IoT has all the features that supply skillful user interface, security, in addition to networking. You tin john implement the same inward Contiki past times making utilization of your programming skills. Thus, if yous tin john adapt storage, Windows 10 IoT should hold out preferred every bit it volition salve a lot of fourth dimension on coding. However, if yous are constrained on infinite in addition to RAM (to create smaller devices or to brand the device battery final longer), Contiki should hold out your choice.
The higher upwards is a bird’s oculus stance of Contiki vs Windows 10 for IoT – Internet of Things. This comparing aims to assist yous inward choosing the amend operating organization for your IoT project.
Source: https://www.thewindowsclub.com/
comment 0 Comments
more_vert